January 25th, 2008
Digg Alters the Definition of “Popular”
By Michael Santo
Executive Editor, RealTechNews
Most people know how Digg works. You submit a story, and based on how many people vote it up or down, it will hopefully be moved from “upcoming” to “popular.” Until now it’s been based on sheer numbers, but last night Digg founder Kevin Rose unveiled a new algorithm which turns this upside down.
According to his blog post, popularity depends on:
One of the keys to getting a story promoted is diversity in Digging activity. When the algorithm gets the diversity it needs, it will promote a story from the Upcoming section to the home page. This way, the system knows a large variety of people will be into the story.
What’s this mean? It means, basically, if the algorithm works, an end to groups voting up a story. Frequently Digg and other social networking sites have groups of people voting up each others’ stories. There’s also a lot of politics involved, too, with some people voting down stories of members they may dislike for one reason or another.
According to Rose, this could mean a story with 100+ Diggs would remain “upcoming.” I can see the point of this change. Additionally, one of Merriam-Webster’s definition of popular is of or relating to the general public,” which this diversity aspect would hope to achieve.
But a second one is “suitable to the majority.” Hard to see how leaving out something with 100+ Diggs satisfies that definition.
More

By 

By
By 




