By David Johnston
Contributing Writer, RealTechNews

Today, AMD filed an antitrust complaint against Intel for Intel’s monopolistic and anticompetitive practices. In AMD’s official complaint they cite many instances of Intel using its larger size and resources to push AMD out of the market. Examples include Dell (of course), IBM, Sony, Toshiba, HP, NEC, Fujitsu, EMachines, Gateway, and the list goes on (to include practically every large OEM that exists). The complaint is full of quotes from high-ups in many of those companies as well as interesting (and fairly damning) information detailing Intel’s practices. I will include a few here for your reading pleasure:
From the Sony section:
“By the end of 2002, AMD had achieved an overall Japanese unit market share of approximately 22%. To reverse the erosion of its business, in 2003 Intel paid Sony multimillion dollar sums, disguised as discounts and promotional support, in exchange for absolute microprocessor exclusivity. Sony abruptly canceled an AMD Mobile Athlon notebook model. Soon thereafter, it canceled plans to release AMD Athlon desktop and notebook computers. As a result, AMD’s share of Sony’s business dropped from 23% in 2002 to 8% in 2003, and then to 0%, where it remains today.”
From the Toshiba section:
“Toshiba was once a significant AMD customer, but also like Sony, Toshiba received a very substantial payment from Intel in 2001 not to use AMD processors. Toshiba thereupon dropped AMD. Its executives agreed that Intel’s financial inducements amounted to “cocaine,” but said they were hooked because reengaging with AMD would jeopardize Intel market development funds estimated to be worth $25-30 million per quarter. Toshiba made clear to AMD that the tens of millions of dollars of additional marketing support was provided on the explicit condition that Toshiba could not use AMD microprocessors.”
From the NEC section:
“AMD also enjoyed early success with NEC, capturing nearly 40% of its microprocessor purchases for notebooks and desktops in the first quarter of 2002. In May 2002, Intel agreed to pay NEC more than 300 million yen per quarter in exchange for caps on NEC’s purchases from AMD. The caps assured Intel at least 90% of NEC’s business in Japan, and they established an overall worldwide quota on NEC’s AMD dealings. The impact was immediate. While AMD had maintained an 84% share of NEC’s Japanese consumer desktop business in the third quarter of 2002, after the payments, AMD’s share quickly plummeted to virtually zero in the first quarter of 2003.”
From the Gateway section:
“From 2001 to 2004, Gateway was exclusively Intel. In 2001 former Gateway CEO, Ted Waitt, explained to an AMD executive that Intel offered him large sums not to deal with AMD, which he could not refuse: ‘I have to find a way back to profitability. If by dropping you, I become profitable, that is what I will do.’ ”
This is only a small sampling of what you’ll find in the 48-page complaint (linked to above). AMD’s CEO, Hector Ruiz, has also published an open letter on AMD’s website summarizing why they are doing this. A lot more information can be found on that webpage.
Note that this comes after Japan has already cited Intel for anticompetitive practices just a few months ago. All I can say is that it’s about time AMD did this.
Source #1: AMDZone
Source #2: AMD
Source #3: ArsTechnica