July 25th, 2008
Yahoo! Repeats Microsoft’s DRM Server Mistake
By Michael Santo
Editor-in-Chief, RealTechNews
Now we know: Microsoft and Yahoo! are perfect for each other. Despite watching Microsoft’s recent debacle when it announced it was going to shut down the licensing servers for their defunct Music Store - a debacle which resulted in Microsoft reversing its decision - Yahoo! decided to try to do the same thing.
Thursday Yahoo! sent an email to customers of its Yahoo! Unlimited Music Store, indicating that the store would close its virtual doors in September. You can download the full email (.PDF) from here. Here’s the painful part of the email:
After September 30, 2008, you will not be able to transfer songs to unauthorized computers or relicense these songs after changing operating systems. Please note that your purchased tracks will generally continue to play on your existing authorized computers unless there is a change to the computer’s operating system.
Hey, the same great deal as Microsoft: as long as your PCs never crash or anything, you’re gold.
Just as they did when Microsoft tried the same “stunt,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation chimed in, saying that to do rigth by its customers, Yahoo! should:
- Issue a full public apology to your Yahoo! Music customers.
- Offer to refund the purchase price of the affected downloads or, at the customer’s option, provide replacements from an online store that offers the same tracks in a DRM-free format.
- Ensure that all Yahoo! Music buyers have (or have permanent access to) receipts identifying dates, amounts, and titles purchased, so they have proofs of purchase. Or, better yet, offer to cover their legal costs if they are hit with a copyright infringement claim based on a song purchased through Yahoo! Music.
- Widely publicize the above measures so that Yahoo! customers know their options. That publicity should include, at a minimum, advertising in major music magazines and newspapers in every major U.S. city, as well as targeted keyword advertising.
Sounds pretty much like what they told Microsoft to do.
But what’s strange is that Yahoo! monitored the situation, and decided that DRM was a dead end, and that rather than extending licensing server support for years, as Microsoft did, the best way to do it was to force their customers to deal with it cold turkey. Michael Spiegelman, Yahoo’s senior director of music said:
“We definitely tracked the situation closely. We found (the decision to continue supporting DRM keys for three more years) just prolongs the pain. It keeps the DRM question going for years. We want to help people make the transition now.”
Well, if you want to help people, how about giving DRM-free copies to former customers of your store? Yeah, I know, it makes too much sense.
Since Yahoo! watched the situation with Microsoft closely and obviously gave this a great deal of thought, it’s doubtful they’ll change their mind, but we’ll see.













Kevin K. says:
Ever since Yahoo bought and ruined Musicmatch Jukebox, they’ve been on my “do not patronize” list.
It was bad enough that Musicmatch Jukebox had some features that disappeared after a year even though you purchased the software, but they stopped updating it and did not allow you to use the paid-for features anymore (mostly due to it phoning home every time you started it up and having to check some stupid license server which, even though MMJB no longer existed, it still prevented you from using the software to its fullest).
Then, Yahoo acquired MMJB and changed it to Yahoo Jukebox which FORCED you to use a Yahoo account in order to run the software with all its features.
When I am simply going through my database of music (all of which was ripped off my own CDs), modifying some tags, or just listening to something, I have no need to phone home for any reason but that’s the way it was set up.
So I essentially was forced to stop using software for which I paid by the company who wants me to use it!
Instead of simply providing a piece of software for a user to use, they instead try to control your life and data insidiously and end up just ruining the whole product.
Let them do stupid things so they drop off the chart. A form of natural selection in my opinion.
July 25th, 2008 at 9:00 am
LZW says:
Both consumer groups and end users warned (severely and vocally warned) many companies aswell as the entire content industry that DRM was a bad idea… Would they listen?
Just like microsoft, yahoo will probably loose people who otherwise would have been life long loyal customers. I guess with soo many millions of customers, loosing a few don’t hurt… Yet sooner or later, the entire yahoo name will be tarnished forever! Do they want to become the next AOL?
What are you?
An AOL-Lamer or a Yahoo-Looser?
It’s only a matter of time before Yahoo starts becoming the subject of parody songs from Weird Al Yankovic.
“You’re waxin’ your modem, tryin’ to make it go faster
Hey fella, I bet you’re still livin’ in your parents’ cellar
Downloadin’ pictures of Sarah Michelle Gellar
And postin’ “Me too!” like some brain-dead AOL-er
I should do the world a favor and cap you like Old Yeller
You’re just about as useless as jpegs to Hellen Keller” — Weird Al “All About The Pentiums”
July 25th, 2008 at 5:30 pm