Comments on: Windows Vista 37% Less Vulnerable Than Windows XP: Study http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658 Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:06:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Mike http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-775670 Sat, 17 May 2008 10:26:46 +0000 http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-775670 People lets stop wineing shall we and start building 7 , forget about Vista and lets build for the future shall we . People lets stop wineing shall we and start building 7 , forget about Vista and lets build for the future shall we .

]]> by: peavy http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764857 Mon, 12 May 2008 19:10:25 +0000 http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764857 37% eh give it a another year them numbers will change. 37% eh give it a another year them numbers will change.

]]> by: Vista - 100% Pure Fail http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764790 Mon, 12 May 2008 18:38:54 +0000 http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764790 Just shows that I've done the best already in staying with the Win2003-based XP 64. Just shows that I’ve done the best already in staying with the Win2003-based XP 64.

]]> by: Micro$ux Blows Chunks!!!! http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764480 Mon, 12 May 2008 15:38:56 +0000 http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764480 Micro$ux & security should never be mentioned in the same sentence...... Micro$ux & security should never be mentioned in the same sentence……

]]> by: John Corliss http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764052 Mon, 12 May 2008 11:27:02 +0000 http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5658#comment-764052 Well then, I guess I'd better drop 2k on a new computer and printer so that I can enjoy Vista's "better security". Of course, I'll have to get used to the clunkier interface and continual interruptions with Vista asking me if I really, really want to do something. On the other hand, I can continue to use XP with a third party (freeware) firewall and all the unnecessary services and processes disabled, and have better security than Vista. Vista is a dog. There are no compelling reasons to upgrade to it and many not to. Well then, I guess I’d better drop 2k on a new computer and printer so that I can enjoy Vista’s “better security”. Of course, I’ll have to get used to the clunkier interface and continual interruptions with Vista asking me if I really, really want to do something. On the other hand, I can continue to use XP with a third party (freeware) firewall and all the unnecessary services and processes disabled, and have better security than Vista.

Vista is a dog. There are no compelling reasons to upgrade to it and many not to.

]]>