<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aaagh! Ad-Enabled PDFs Coming from Adobe, Yahoo</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-436033</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-436033</guid>
					<description>Yes, ads are an evil necessity in todays internet, BUT somewhere it does have to stop.




www.myfreelivesite.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, ads are an evil necessity in todays internet, BUT somewhere it does have to stop.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.myfreelivesite.com' rel='nofollow'>www.myfreelivesite.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-383509</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-383509</guid>
					<description>Not wanting ads misses the point.  Of course nobody wants ads.

Ads represent a product with negative value to the consumer, and positive value to the supplier.  This is ideal, since most products are the other way around, and therefore ads represent a kind of silent barter between producer and consumer, that doesn't require exchange of funds.

Since that's exactly what's needed on the internet, ads will continue to serve the purpose.

After all, what else could a free content supplier GIVE you that would help repay its own costs for the other content they GIVE you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not wanting ads misses the point.  Of course nobody wants ads.</p>
<p>Ads represent a product with negative value to the consumer, and positive value to the supplier.  This is ideal, since most products are the other way around, and therefore ads represent a kind of silent barter between producer and consumer, that doesn&#8217;t require exchange of funds.</p>
<p>Since that&#8217;s exactly what&#8217;s needed on the internet, ads will continue to serve the purpose.</p>
<p>After all, what else could a free content supplier GIVE you that would help repay its own costs for the other content they GIVE you?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-382938</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-382938</guid>
					<description>No more ads! We are over marketed to as it is. It is hard to even comprehend all of the places where advertising encroaches. I do not want ads in my PDFs, I do not want ads in my emails, I do not want ads beamed into my brain while I sleep (because you know someone somewhere is working on this very thing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more ads! We are over marketed to as it is. It is hard to even comprehend all of the places where advertising encroaches. I do not want ads in my PDFs, I do not want ads in my emails, I do not want ads beamed into my brain while I sleep (because you know someone somewhere is working on this very thing).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed3</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-381852</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-381852</guid>
					<description>Don't use Adobe's reader. Try Foxit. http://www.foxitsoftware.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t use Adobe&#8217;s reader. Try Foxit. <a href='http://www.foxitsoftware.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-381581</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-381581</guid>
					<description>Yep, that was my FIRST thought.  BLOCK THEM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that was my FIRST thought.  BLOCK THEM!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin K.</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-381577</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/5103#comment-381577</guid>
					<description>Never open a PDF while connected or use your firewall to deny access to the internet for Adobe Reader.  In fact, when I open a PDF from the web and ZoneAlarm pops up asking if I want to allow Acrobat to access the internet, I always deny it and the PDF opens right up.

Unless they change that somehow, that's what I'd do.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never open a PDF while connected or use your firewall to deny access to the internet for Adobe Reader.  In fact, when I open a PDF from the web and ZoneAlarm pops up asking if I want to allow Acrobat to access the internet, I always deny it and the PDF opens right up.</p>
<p>Unless they change that somehow, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;d do&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.434 seconds -->
