<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PS3 Price cut: Only Temporary</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: &#187; Wal-Mart Brochure Confirms (?) Xbox 360 Price Drop &#187; Blog Archive&#160; &#160;Alice Hill&#8217;s Real Tech News - Independent Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611#comment-240634</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611#comment-240634</guid>
					<description>[...] The reason I say confirms (?) is because the only evidence of this is an image posted to the web &#8230; and it&#8217;s not a huge picture either &#8230; but the $349 price is clear &#8230; so it&#8217;s either been Photoshopped or we&#8217;re seeing another console price drop (hope exists after the PS3 Price Drop that turned out to not be a Price Drop). The teensy picture above purports to depict a new Wal-mart ad with that oft-rumored new $349 price point for the Xbox 360 Premium. The EXIF data checks out, so if it is a prank at least they took the time to do it right. Source: enGadget [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The reason I say confirms (?) is because the only evidence of this is an image posted to the web &#8230; and it&#8217;s not a huge picture either &#8230; but the $349 price is clear &#8230; so it&#8217;s either been Photoshopped or we&#8217;re seeing another console price drop (hope exists after the PS3 Price Drop that turned out to not be a Price Drop). The teensy picture above purports to depict a new Wal-mart ad with that oft-rumored new $349 price point for the Xbox 360 Premium. The EXIF data checks out, so if it is a prank at least they took the time to do it right. Source: enGadget [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611#comment-229445</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611#comment-229445</guid>
					<description>with Wii outselling the PS3 in Japan

4 to 1 in April
5 to 1 in May
6 to 1 in June

it seems the Japanese have figured out that the PS3 is not all it's cracked up to be.   Its price is largely irrelevant once the rest of us catch up.

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6194474.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with Wii outselling the PS3 in Japan</p>
<p>4 to 1 in April<br />
5 to 1 in May<br />
6 to 1 in June</p>
<p>it seems the Japanese have figured out that the PS3 is not all it&#8217;s cracked up to be.   Its price is largely irrelevant once the rest of us catch up.</p>
<p><a href='http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6194474.html' rel='nofollow'>http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6194474.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611#comment-229444</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4611#comment-229444</guid>
					<description>with Wii outselling the PS3 in Japan

4 to 1 in April
5 to 1 in May
6 to 1 in June

it seems the Japanese have figured out that the PS3 is not all it's cracked up to be.   Its price is largely irrelevant once the rest of us catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with Wii outselling the PS3 in Japan</p>
<p>4 to 1 in April<br />
5 to 1 in May<br />
6 to 1 in June</p>
<p>it seems the Japanese have figured out that the PS3 is not all it&#8217;s cracked up to be.   Its price is largely irrelevant once the rest of us catch up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.527 seconds -->
