<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interest in iPhone = High &#8230; Actual Buyers &#8230; Well &#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356#comment-171206</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 09:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356#comment-171206</guid>
					<description>There are a bunch of phones on the market with "chicklet" type keypads -- pretty much smooth face, little feedback -- that are proving very popular.

I even bought one, although I prefer real keys.  Other phone features outweighed the desire for real keys.  That may end up being the case here, and I note that I've used PDAs both with and without keys and ended up preferring those without -- they're smaller.

YMMV but I like the iphone in concept.  I think the massively improved address book integration (versus every phone I've ever used, anyway) likely negates a strong need for buttons except if you send a lot of text messages.  And even for that I'd like to try it before I decided it's screwed up.

If I could replace my PDA with it entirely I would almost certainly buy one, and thought hard about whether or not I should (wait to) get one to replace my aging phone a few months ago.  But Cingular ... don't really want Cingular.  Don't really want to pay that much for a phone.  Can do almost everything I use my PDA for, but not quite (like I'd have to ditch my ebook library).

Pass this time.  We'll see how it looks in a couple of years.  But I would be surprised if this phone doesn't sell as many as Apple can produce for the first couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a bunch of phones on the market with &#8220;chicklet&#8221; type keypads &#8212; pretty much smooth face, little feedback &#8212; that are proving very popular.</p>
<p>I even bought one, although I prefer real keys.  Other phone features outweighed the desire for real keys.  That may end up being the case here, and I note that I&#8217;ve used PDAs both with and without keys and ended up preferring those without &#8212; they&#8217;re smaller.</p>
<p>YMMV but I like the iphone in concept.  I think the massively improved address book integration (versus every phone I&#8217;ve ever used, anyway) likely negates a strong need for buttons except if you send a lot of text messages.  And even for that I&#8217;d like to try it before I decided it&#8217;s screwed up.</p>
<p>If I could replace my PDA with it entirely I would almost certainly buy one, and thought hard about whether or not I should (wait to) get one to replace my aging phone a few months ago.  But Cingular &#8230; don&#8217;t really want Cingular.  Don&#8217;t really want to pay that much for a phone.  Can do almost everything I use my PDA for, but not quite (like I&#8217;d have to ditch my ebook library).</p>
<p>Pass this time.  We&#8217;ll see how it looks in a couple of years.  But I would be surprised if this phone doesn&#8217;t sell as many as Apple can produce for the first couple of years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Another Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356#comment-170593</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356#comment-170593</guid>
					<description>Charles, you got it right. physical buttons I can use while the device is still in my pocket is what I need. The reason I got my current phone(w810i) is because the buttons feel perfect when it's in my pocket. Oh that and it does music very well. 

Buuuuuut. I'm still very interested in the iPhone. Not that I'd be getting one but once it's out we'll be seeing every cell maker coming up with something new and exciting. And that is something to get excited about. Screw the iPhone; I can't wait til everyone has something to compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, you got it right. physical buttons I can use while the device is still in my pocket is what I need. The reason I got my current phone(w810i) is because the buttons feel perfect when it&#8217;s in my pocket. Oh that and it does music very well. </p>
<p>Buuuuuut. I&#8217;m still very interested in the iPhone. Not that I&#8217;d be getting one but once it&#8217;s out we&#8217;ll be seeing every cell maker coming up with something new and exciting. And that is something to get excited about. Screw the iPhone; I can&#8217;t wait til everyone has something to compete.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356#comment-170397</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 08:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4356#comment-170397</guid>
					<description>Sorry, but in the real world, cell phones need physical buttons.

As a low-use "isn't it cool!" device, it is the ultimate.

I'm not really a heavy cell user, and even I want a keypad buttons, small enough to fit in my front pocket, and a reasonably durable screen.

It's a lot of money for a device with a questionable level of practicality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but in the real world, cell phones need physical buttons.</p>
<p>As a low-use &#8220;isn&#8217;t it cool!&#8221; device, it is the ultimate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really a heavy cell user, and even I want a keypad buttons, small enough to fit in my front pocket, and a reasonably durable screen.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a lot of money for a device with a questionable level of practicality.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.323 seconds -->
