<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When They Say Upgrade, They Mean It: No Clean Installs with Windows Vista Upgrade Discs</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Pilot</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-213701</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-213701</guid>
					<description>You can perform a Clean Install of All Versions using just an upgrade disc to see how just click the link and find a post yes you can
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-12546_102-0.html?forumID=133&#38;threadID=226764&#38;messageID=2365399</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can perform a Clean Install of All Versions using just an upgrade disc to see how just click the link and find a post yes you can<br />
<a href='http://forums.cnet.com/5208-12546_102-0.html?forumID=133&amp;threadID=226764&amp;messageID=2365399' rel='nofollow'>http://forums.cnet.com/5208-12546_102-0.html?forumID=133&amp;threadID=226764&amp;messageID=2365399</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-108935</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-108935</guid>
					<description>Two issues are getting intertwined.

a. upgrade versions: yes, you need to install on a computer where XP resides

b. clean install: yes, you can do a clean install -- i just did with vista business upgrade.

my strategy:
xp resided on a fat32 volume.
patitioned a new volume on a separate hard drive (in this case third hard drive, H:). and used partition magic to format it was ntfs.

C. then i ran vista setup from within xp.

D. because xp was on a fat32 volume, the install blocked the choice to install there and instead presented only one choice: a full install on H:, the ntfs volume.

E. installed like a charm and validated just fine.

buzzing along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two issues are getting intertwined.</p>
<p>a. upgrade versions: yes, you need to install on a computer where XP resides</p>
<p>b. clean install: yes, you can do a clean install &#8212; i just did with vista business upgrade.</p>
<p>my strategy:<br />
xp resided on a fat32 volume.<br />
patitioned a new volume on a separate hard drive (in this case third hard drive, H:). and used partition magic to format it was ntfs.</p>
<p>C. then i ran vista setup from within xp.</p>
<p>D. because xp was on a fat32 volume, the install blocked the choice to install there and instead presented only one choice: a full install on H:, the ntfs volume.</p>
<p>E. installed like a charm and validated just fine.</p>
<p>buzzing along.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Techo blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Introducing Vista &#8216;Time Waster&#8217; Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-108804</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-108804</guid>
					<description>[...] &#8220;Many may say, what&#8217;s wrong with that? But when switching OSes like this, you should really have a clean install. Otherwise you&#8217;re going to have a system full of unused files and garbage. I realize that most users will just go with the direct upgrade, without starting from scratch, but I wouldn&#8217;t be one of them.&#8221;&#8211;Real Tech News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Many may say, what&#8217;s wrong with that? But when switching OSes like this, you should really have a clean install. Otherwise you&#8217;re going to have a system full of unused files and garbage. I realize that most users will just go with the direct upgrade, without starting from scratch, but I wouldn&#8217;t be one of them.&#8221;&#8211;Real Tech News [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: &#187; Workaround for &#8220;Clean Install&#8221; for Vista Upgrades Discovered &#187; Blog Archive&#160; &#160;Alice Hill&#8217;s Real Tech News - Independent Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-108460</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-108460</guid>
					<description>[...] Earlier I wrote about clean installs not being available any longer with Windows Vista Upgrade DVDs. There was conjecture that it might be related to Home versions, but even the mainstream press was confused. Now, it seems Paul Thurott, through some internal Microsoft documents, has discovered a workaround. However, he did not test it, but the enterprising folks at DailyTech did, and they confirm it works. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Earlier I wrote about clean installs not being available any longer with Windows Vista Upgrade DVDs. There was conjecture that it might be related to Home versions, but even the mainstream press was confused. Now, it seems Paul Thurott, through some internal Microsoft documents, has discovered a workaround. However, he did not test it, but the enterprising folks at DailyTech did, and they confirm it works. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Troxel</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-107236</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-107236</guid>
					<description>Workaround found:  During 1st install, don't enter key code.  Vista installs as trial version.  Install again, using key code.  Delete old files.  Convoluted, but supposedly it works.  Full article at http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5932</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workaround found:  During 1st install, don&#8217;t enter key code.  Vista installs as trial version.  Install again, using key code.  Delete old files.  Convoluted, but supposedly it works.  Full article at <a href='http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5932' rel='nofollow'>http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5932</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Peck</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106438</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106438</guid>
					<description>Great, so lets say you get some Vista only hardware. A new HD that XP will not recognize not even with the F6 press on install to load a driver manually. Guess what? You can no longer user your legal copy of Vista either.

Plus who wants the old XP stuff laying around? Good thing I did the work to slipstream SP2 onto my XP CD so I could get back to Vista sooner if I ever install it. Looks like that is going to be an even longer time out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, so lets say you get some Vista only hardware. A new HD that XP will not recognize not even with the F6 press on install to load a driver manually. Guess what? You can no longer user your legal copy of Vista either.</p>
<p>Plus who wants the old XP stuff laying around? Good thing I did the work to slipstream SP2 onto my XP CD so I could get back to Vista sooner if I ever install it. Looks like that is going to be an even longer time out now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106388</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106388</guid>
					<description>I can get even worse if this policy is kept for the future versions... can you imagine install Xp -&#62; install Win Vista -&#62; install Win Horizon -&#62; install Win Estratosphere --&#62; etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can get even worse if this policy is kept for the future versions&#8230; can you imagine install Xp -&gt; install Win Vista -&gt; install Win Horizon -&gt; install Win Estratosphere &#8211;&gt; etc
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106382</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106382</guid>
					<description>The funny thing is that with Vista there technically no such thing as an 'Upgrade'.  When you run Upgrade, it does a clean install of Vista and then runs it own migration tools to copy your data and settings.  So even an upgrade isn't really an upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is that with Vista there technically no such thing as an &#8216;Upgrade&#8217;.  When you run Upgrade, it does a clean install of Vista and then runs it own migration tools to copy your data and settings.  So even an upgrade isn&#8217;t really an upgrade.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger Price</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106371</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106371</guid>
					<description>Just give me 1 good reason why you would want to upgrade to Vista. Do you enjoy pain and suffering?  Just buy that new computer or hardware next year with Vista SP2 and save yourself some headaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just give me 1 good reason why you would want to upgrade to Vista. Do you enjoy pain and suffering?  Just buy that new computer or hardware next year with Vista SP2 and save yourself some headaches.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106347</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4063#comment-106347</guid>
					<description>PC Perspective is also saying that the XP install can't just be any XP install.  It has to be a SP2 XP install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC Perspective is also saying that the XP install can&#8217;t just be any XP install.  It has to be a SP2 XP install.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.452 seconds -->
