January 4th, 2007

Expect a 30 Terabyte Drive from Seagate, Soon

By Jimmy Daniels
Contributing Writer, RealTechNews

According to this article from Wired, we could be reaching as high as 30 terabytes on a 3.5 inch drive in the next few years.

Their current solution to this problem is recording data perpendicular to the plane of the media. This technology, however, is expected to peak out at about 1 terabit per square inch. In the next decade, Seagate plans to hit the market with twin technologies that could fly far beyond, ultimately offering as much as 50 terabits per square inch. On a standard 3.5-inch drive, that’s equivalent to 300 terabits of information, enough to hold the uncompressed contents of the Library of Congress.

First up is heat-assisted magnetic recording, or HAMR, which uses lasers to momentarily heat the disk surface and allow the drive heads to write information. When the surface of the drive cools, the bits settle into a more stable state for longer-term reliability. The technology allows a smaller number of grains to be used for each bit of data, taking advantage of high-stability magnetic compounds such as iron platinum.

But laser-powered disk drives are only one side of the coin. It will take so-called bit-pattern media to add the tail to HAMR’s head. Source: Wired

We Say: Talk about storing some digital media, hundreds of thousands of DVD’s, wonder about how many billion MP3’s you could get on one of those? They also mention a competitor to flash memory, called Probe, a non-volatile, magnetic-based media that will come in tiny form factors, but didn’t give any details.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. RSS 2.0

4 comments to "Expect a 30 Terabyte Drive from Seagate, Soon"

  1. Rob says:

    This is going to be great as long as the price is right, which it will be in time. I’m going to be larger then netflicks.

    http://www.angelfire.com/theforce/indermsbut

    January 4th, 2007 at 11:05 am

  2. KJH says:

    Dang it, so you mean that 1.5TB computer that I’m building is already sounding like a dud?! ;-)

    What is *so* funny is that when I told my Dad, he said in the most incredulous voice “Really? What do you need all of that space for?” Well, we all know the infamous Bill Gates’ quote about memory, don’t we…

    January 5th, 2007 at 2:00 am

  3. Patrick Clark says:

    Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t the Wired article talking about a density of 300 ” Terabits “on a 3 1/2 inch drive, not 300 Terabytes? You’re out by a factor of roughly 10. Still though, that’s huge amount of information on one drive.

    Enjoyable posting all the same!
    Patrick Clark,
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

    January 5th, 2007 at 3:17 am

  4. Jimmy says:

    Patrick, you are absolutely right, I saw posts on other sites that said the same thing, so, once again I assumed. Gotta, quit doing that. 300 terabits is actually about 34 terabytes.

    Seagate has confirmed a 1 terabyte drive for the first half of this year. http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5582

    January 5th, 2007 at 7:42 am

Leave a comment