<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless Power - One Step Closer</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Franciov</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779#comment-85748</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779#comment-85748</guid>
					<description>I've found this website...
http://www.splashpower.com/
It will start to sell products incorporating Splashpower technology (wireless power) in 2007. Does wireless power already exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found this website&#8230;<br />
<a href='http://www.splashpower.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.splashpower.com/</a><br />
It will start to sell products incorporating Splashpower technology (wireless power) in 2007. Does wireless power already exist?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Freud</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779#comment-85543</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779#comment-85543</guid>
					<description>With people always citing concerns for residence near power lines and cell towers, I could only imagine the uproar over the introduction of this technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With people always citing concerns for residence near power lines and cell towers, I could only imagine the uproar over the introduction of this technology.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Corliss</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779#comment-85483</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3779#comment-85483</guid>
					<description>There are those who say that Nikola Tesla was responsible for the Tunguska explosion in 1908. If this is true, then it's probably not a good idea to promote the ultimate "death ray" technology for this (questionably needed) convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are those who say that Nikola Tesla was responsible for the Tunguska explosion in 1908. If this is true, then it&#8217;s probably not a good idea to promote the ultimate &#8220;death ray&#8221; technology for this (questionably needed) convenience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.424 seconds -->
