<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another 5th Birthday This Week &#8212; Happy Birthday, Windows XP</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Harsomtus</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-119865</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-119865</guid>
					<description>Download everything - Mozilla Firefox is a Mozilla redesign similar to Galleon, K-Meleon and Chimera. His principal difference is that has been elaborated by the system XUL and say € ado to be multi - platform. The advantages of this browser are evident, being light, sure, compact and functional. And the Top 10 Logiciels - 

1  Messenger 8  
2  Kazaa Lite K++2.7
3  Nero 7.5.9.0
4  Winamp 5.12 Full
5  Win SMS
6  Winzip 10
7  WinRar 3.5
8  Adobe Acrobat 7.0
9  MixVibes 4.01
10 Ares Lite 1.8.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Download everything - Mozilla Firefox is a Mozilla redesign similar to Galleon, K-Meleon and Chimera. His principal difference is that has been elaborated by the system XUL and say € ado to be multi - platform. The advantages of this browser are evident, being light, sure, compact and functional. And the Top 10 Logiciels - </p>
<p>1  Messenger 8<br />
2  Kazaa Lite K++2.7<br />
3  Nero 7.5.9.0<br />
4  Winamp 5.12 Full<br />
5  Win SMS<br />
6  Winzip 10<br />
7  WinRar 3.5<br />
8  Adobe Acrobat 7.0<br />
9  MixVibes 4.01<br />
10 Ares Lite 1.8.1
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Harpocrates</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-113269</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-113269</guid>
					<description>Learn and enjoy commenting Of Yours fantasys and perverse lusts.
Do not forget to leave comments and to tell your friends and ¡¡¡fiancèes!!!! to visit this blog and implement everything what it is possible to be learned in this site … My better desires and perversions for all of you !!! Yeah…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learn and enjoy commenting Of Yours fantasys and perverse lusts.<br />
Do not forget to leave comments and to tell your friends and ¡¡¡fiancèes!!!! to visit this blog and implement everything what it is possible to be learned in this site … My better desires and perversions for all of you !!! Yeah…
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aperet-Isis</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-112603</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-112603</guid>
					<description>I invite you to visit the best Blog de extra Fun XXX - composed with: Photos Galleries, direct Video Chat, the best stories, adventures and more funny things to satisfy any curiosity, physiological and visual needs….. come, learn and enjoy commenting Of Yours fantasys and perverse lusts.
Do not forget to leave comments and to tell your friends and ¡¡¡fiancèes!!!! to visit this blog and implement everything what it is possible to be learned in this site … My better desires and perversions for all of you !!! Yeah…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I invite you to visit the best Blog de extra Fun XXX - composed with: Photos Galleries, direct Video Chat, the best stories, adventures and more funny things to satisfy any curiosity, physiological and visual needs….. come, learn and enjoy commenting Of Yours fantasys and perverse lusts.<br />
Do not forget to leave comments and to tell your friends and ¡¡¡fiancèes!!!! to visit this blog and implement everything what it is possible to be learned in this site … My better desires and perversions for all of you !!! Yeah…
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SimplyBored &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Focus: Digital Photography Goodies in Vista, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-83161</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-83161</guid>
					<description>[...] Another 5th Birthday This Week Happy Birthday, Windows XPRealTechNews,&#160;CA&#160;- Oct 26, 2006&#8230; 5th birthday as well. This week, Windows XP turns five. And despite its maligned image, especially security-wise. there s no denying &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another 5th Birthday This Week Happy Birthday, Windows XPRealTechNews,&nbsp;CA&nbsp;- Oct 26, 2006&#8230; 5th birthday as well. This week, Windows XP turns five. And despite its maligned image, especially security-wise. there s no denying &#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81598</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81598</guid>
					<description>I have a legitimate license for Windows 2000 Pro.
I have it installed on my 2.9-year old Athlon whitebox.
I have it installed in a Parallels VM under Mac OSX. And, yes that is legitimate as my license states: "2 copies".
Why pay for XP when all it will get me is eye candy (annoying eye candy at that)?
I am considering upgrading my Parallels VM to XP only so I can run IE 7 which I will soon need for testing websites that I build. Otherwise, I would stay with IE 6 and 2000 "forever".

,dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a legitimate license for Windows 2000 Pro.<br />
I have it installed on my 2.9-year old Athlon whitebox.<br />
I have it installed in a Parallels VM under Mac OSX. And, yes that is legitimate as my license states: &#8220;2 copies&#8221;.<br />
Why pay for XP when all it will get me is eye candy (annoying eye candy at that)?<br />
I am considering upgrading my Parallels VM to XP only so I can run IE 7 which I will soon need for testing websites that I build. Otherwise, I would stay with IE 6 and 2000 &#8220;forever&#8221;.</p>
<p>,dave
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81496</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81496</guid>
					<description>Hi Andy,

I could agree with you if the situation involved a new PC and you want the latest version of anything.

But for an "occasional" gamer whose software system requirements are met with his current hardware, I don't see why XP would be any advantage.  My current 2 year old installation works fine.

Even if I were to reinstall Windows 2000 Pro yet again,  the process of updating would not be "sickening" as you stated...all that's required is broadband (which I have) and part of an afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy,</p>
<p>I could agree with you if the situation involved a new PC and you want the latest version of anything.</p>
<p>But for an &#8220;occasional&#8221; gamer whose software system requirements are met with his current hardware, I don&#8217;t see why XP would be any advantage.  My current 2 year old installation works fine.</p>
<p>Even if I were to reinstall Windows 2000 Pro yet again,  the process of updating would not be &#8220;sickening&#8221; as you stated&#8230;all that&#8217;s required is broadband (which I have) and part of an afternoon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81448</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81448</guid>
					<description>Windows 2000 has so many patches its sickening to install without a slipstreamed disk.  I'll bet the main reason you are "sticking" with Windows 2000 is because you have an incredibly old installation, or don't have a legit copy of XP, otherwise I can't see any reason one would install 2000 now.  There are plently of things that annoy me about XP too.  &lt;a href="http://paininthetech.com/6_windows_xp_annoyances_fixed" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here are the fixed to 6 things that annoy me about XP&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 2000 has so many patches its sickening to install without a slipstreamed disk.  I&#8217;ll bet the main reason you are &#8220;sticking&#8221; with Windows 2000 is because you have an incredibly old installation, or don&#8217;t have a legit copy of XP, otherwise I can&#8217;t see any reason one would install 2000 now.  There are plently of things that annoy me about XP too.  <a href="http://paininthetech.com/6_windows_xp_annoyances_fixed" rel="nofollow">Here are the fixed to 6 things that annoy me about XP</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Corliss</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81436</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81436</guid>
					<description>If Millennium Edition was a stable as XP and could handle the same maximum file size, I would still be using it. My computer is a single user computer and doesn't need any networking stuff. I also don't like the way things like Messenger, WMP and IE are shoved down my throat. This is just skimming the surface of my complaints about XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Millennium Edition was a stable as XP and could handle the same maximum file size, I would still be using it. My computer is a single user computer and doesn&#8217;t need any networking stuff. I also don&#8217;t like the way things like Messenger, WMP and IE are shoved down my throat. This is just skimming the surface of my complaints about XP.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81414</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81414</guid>
					<description>I have to agree with DEGUSTIBUS, and perhaps it's because I'm running a pc that's a bit old:

a 1.3 Tualatin on Intel 815E-based mainboard, upgraded to max RAM capacity (512 Mb) and 128 Mb AGP card, that originally came with XP installed.

Win2000 Pro runs far more efficiently for me on this PC, very rarely ever having a problem.   XP was a resource hog, even if shutting down unnecessary services via service.msc and msconfig settings.

Unfortunately I'm running into limitations already... as an example, the very latest version of MSN Messenger requires you to have XP.  But my installed version (7.0) still works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with DEGUSTIBUS, and perhaps it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m running a pc that&#8217;s a bit old:</p>
<p>a 1.3 Tualatin on Intel 815E-based mainboard, upgraded to max RAM capacity (512 Mb) and 128 Mb AGP card, that originally came with XP installed.</p>
<p>Win2000 Pro runs far more efficiently for me on this PC, very rarely ever having a problem.   XP was a resource hog, even if shutting down unnecessary services via service.msc and msconfig settings.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I&#8217;m running into limitations already&#8230; as an example, the very latest version of MSN Messenger requires you to have XP.  But my installed version (7.0) still works fine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: degustibus</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81396</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 03:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3698#comment-81396</guid>
					<description>I don't see the XP adavantages.  I'm very happy w/ Win2000, run it (as well as Win98SE) on most of my machines except the notebooks that came native with XP.

(Tried Vista, hate it, eyecandy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the XP adavantages.  I&#8217;m very happy w/ Win2000, run it (as well as Win98SE) on most of my machines except the notebooks that came native with XP.</p>
<p>(Tried Vista, hate it, eyecandy)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.466 seconds -->
