September 1st, 2006

Apple To Sell Movies Through iTunes–But Why Bother?

By David Johnston
Contributing Writer, RealTechNews

BusinessWeek Online is reporting that Apple will soon announce the sale of full-length films through its iTunes music store. The BuisinessWeek story also includes one more interesting detail: the price. Apple plans to price movies at around $14.99 for newer releases and $9.99 for older titles. That may sound like a good deal if you’re still buying most of your movies from brick and mortar retailers, but after having switched to using online stores such as Amazon.com almost exclusively, this pricing structure has left me scratching my head.

First off, the movies you download are certainly going to be restricted with Apple DRM. This will likely mean headaches for anyone wishing to watch their movies on more than one computer, much less burn them to DVD’s for offline viewing–something I doubt will be possible since consumer DVD burners cannot burn retail DVD’s CSS copy protection. So, DVD’s burned from iTunes would likely be unprotected from copying and piracy…something I have a feeling the RIAA wouldn’t go for. Whether or not you’ll be able to burn DVD’s of the movies you download leads to another question: what kind of extra content will there be included? Will these movies have the extra features one gets with normal DVD’s? The reason I wonder about this is because frequently movies use dual-layer DVD discs which offer almost twice the capacity of regular DVD’s. This allows the DVD makers to add in extra features and keep the movie uncompressed. It seems doubtful that Apple will include these extra features in movie downloads in order to save space.

My next misgiving is the price. At almost $15 per movie, you’re really not getting that great of a deal. Just look at what average new DVD releases cost at Amazon. For example, as of the time of this writing V for Vendetta which was just released to DVD in August is selling for $15.87. That’s less than one dollar more than what Apple will sell movies for, and you can get free shipping if your order goes over $25. For that extra $0.88 you get a pressed DVD (which will last longer than a burned DVD and longer than your hard drive or iPod) that comes in nice packaging that will also keep it safe. This pressed DVD can be played on any of your DVD players or computers without having to transfer a multi-gigabyte file around, deal with messy Apple DRM, and at full-quality. In comparison, when you purchase a movie from the iTunes store you’re going to have to download it. That means that the main advantage of online purchasing will be almost negated as downloading a couple of gigabytes will take most people a few hours or more on their home internet connections. Additionally, while you’re downloading the movie on iTunes you may be maxing out your bandwidth (unless Apple lets you throttle your speed at the cost of an even longer download time) which could take a toll on online gaming and possibly web browsing. To save space, Apple may decide to compress the movies. However, that will mean decreased quality from that regular DVD which would only cost about $1 more.

The way I see it, downloadable movies from iTunes will be a rip-off for the consumer and not worth purchasing though it’s unclear whether or not that will actually stop it from being a success. I still don’t think that the $0.99 music tracks from iTunes are a great deal for many of the same reasons above, however I do acknowledge that they allow you to download a single song out of an entire album and save money on an otherwise mediocre album. Movies don’t have that advantage, though. You’re either getting everything or nothing. You certainly can’t cut out some boring scenes and decrease the price anyway. Online distribution costs orders of magnitude less money than traditional methods, so why are the movies still so expensive? Surely the electricity and bandwidth for Apples servers aren’t as expensive as Amazon’s employees that organize and run their distribution centers. And the packaging and media that comes with regular DVD purchases may not be too expensive, but it certainly isn’t free either. All I can say is that the savings by the companies participating in online movie downloads certainly are not being passed on to the consumer. Until I start to see value in downloadable movies, I’ll be sticking with plain, old regular DVD’s.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. RSS 2.0

7 comments to "Apple To Sell Movies Through iTunes–But Why Bother?"

  1. Paul Johnson says:

    Instant gratification.

    September 1st, 2006 at 7:46 am

  2. jbelkin says:

    It comes down to CONVENIENCE. Clearly after 1.5 BILLION itunes tracks sold, your value versus convenience is not the same as many, many people.

    It is not a “ripoff.” A ripoff is when you are scammed or not sold what’s promised. The price is right upfront. You know exactly what you are getting and you decide if it’s worth it. A bottle of Coke costs $.75 in a supermarket 6-pack, $1.25 at 7-11 and $3.75 at the Disneyland. Do you walka ll the way out the park and across the street to save $3.00? Maybe - but that’s your choice.

    You are absolutely right in that it’s not the cheapest choice but like the music tracks, EVERYTHING you buy is a compromise. A DVD is nice but it’s also compressed from the original film which is really like 12,000 lines of resolution but DVD’s are an acceptable compromise for now - but compared to HD/BR? Or the next format?

    And sure, you often get extras with a DVD but personally, I rarely watch the extras - 90% of the time, it’s a director gushing over how great EVERYONE is because no one has the guts to say, “That actress is an idiot, I would never work with her again …”

    The ipod/itunes movie will be what it is - a 20-minute (?) download that will sync right up your ipod (presumably a larger screen ipod is coming) so you can take it on the morning or evening commute and watch it straight away.

    Is it your cheapest choice? No but why even buy a DVD, why not just rent and rip it or tape it off HBO? EVERYTHING is a compromise of your persional values, costs and a tradeoff for convenience.

    You’re not wrong to say it’s not for you but you are wrong to say it shouldn’t even be offered or you don’t understand why anyone else would buy it.

    September 1st, 2006 at 1:45 pm

  3. David Johnston says:

    It’s not going to be that convenient as far as I can tell. It’s one thing to download a song that is a couple megabytes. However, it’s another to download a multi-gigabyte movie. In that time, you could just go out to a regular store. That would actually be even more convenient from my perspective unless you don’t have a car.

    September 1st, 2006 at 2:23 pm

  4. Jim Director says:

    No doubt SOME people will buy movies this way, but this is not at all analogous to itunes. Movies are available already in great variety, cheaply, and conveniently. Netflix is a great business model, easily adaptable to HD and Blue-Ray. Pay per view and on demand are also available for home viewing. DVDs can be watched on a laptop or portable player. (So can illegal downloads and non-commercial film.) This takes most of the portable market. This leaves a very small number of people who want to pay a very high price for an inferior product delivered in a substantially inferior way. It is one thing to watch a new or unavailable pirated film in a bad copy with bad display. It’s something entirely different to pay a premium for an inferior version of a commercial product. Itunes was incredibly convenient. This is not.

    September 2nd, 2006 at 3:41 pm

  5. veggiedude says:

    Why get all worked up over speculation? Apple hasn’t announced anything like what you are reporting. Several ‘news sites’ said it was going to be announced at the WWDC, and it didn’t happen.

    September 3rd, 2006 at 8:47 am

  6. Luis says:

    People seem to forget that Steve Jobs is the largest individual shareholder (about 138 Million shares) in disney who owns several media companies. He’s probably getting thier content cheap.

    September 7th, 2006 at 12:37 pm

  7. Why Pay??? says:

    Why pay $13 for one movie when you can get 4 movies a month for $12 on Netflix, transfer and watch them on your iPod? That’s $3/movie.

    September 12th, 2006 at 1:42 pm

Leave a comment