August 31st, 2006
NY Times Story Exclusion Raises Concerns
By Michael Santo
Executive Editor, RealTechNews
Despite the fact that the New York Times felt they not only had valid, but legal reasons to exclude a story from British online readers, legal and media experts are concerned there are new questions being raised by this action. While the Times blocked the story from their site, British newspapers the Times and the Daily Mail published details in print from the Times article.
Media lawyer Mark Stephens of Finer, Stephens, Innocent said he could not see anything wrong with the blocked New York Times article and the decision by British papers to print similar details showed the contempt of court law may be the problem.
“It’s probably unhelpful to have an area of law which is so uncertain where one set of lawyers is saying censor everything while another says there’s nothing wrong with it,” he said. Source: Yahoo! News
We Say: There’s another comment in the story which indicates that blocking the story may actually heighten interest in it … and I agree. It’s not like someone who tried hard enough couldn’t find details from the Times story online somewhere else.













Dave says:
Regarding your theory that blocking a story may increase interest in it. You are exactly correct and there is a precedent:
Review the 1993 Canadian ban on news regarding the murder trial of Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo… and how trivially easy it was for Canadians to find everything they wanted on the internet.
August 31st, 2006 at 8:59 am
Lockergnome's Tech News Watch says:
NY Times Story Exclusion Raises Concerns
Michael Santo of RealTechNews writes: Despite the fact that the New York Times felt it not only had valid, but legal reasons to exclude a story from British online readers, legal and media experts are concerned there are new questions being raised by t…
August 31st, 2006 at 3:43 pm