<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRM-less Music Planned for Yahoo! Music?</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3293</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: TF</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3293#comment-52664</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3293#comment-52664</guid>
					<description>Two problems:

1) Jessica Simpson
2) MP3

why are people so happy about buying music of inferior audio quality??  MP3, no matter how high the bitrate (say 320), is poor compared to what you get on a cd.  Yet people go on about music encoded at 128-- and at that low level, it's an insult to the ears. :(

As for JS, that one should go without saying.

I don't understand why people will settle for this kind of crap just because it's MP3 minus DRM.  The quality still sucks!

And you tech writers should know better anyway.  Smarten up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two problems:</p>
<p>1) Jessica Simpson<br />
2) MP3</p>
<p>why are people so happy about buying music of inferior audio quality??  MP3, no matter how high the bitrate (say 320), is poor compared to what you get on a cd.  Yet people go on about music encoded at 128&#8211; and at that low level, it&#8217;s an insult to the ears. <img src='http://www.realtechnews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for JS, that one should go without saying.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why people will settle for this kind of crap just because it&#8217;s MP3 minus DRM.  The quality still sucks!</p>
<p>And you tech writers should know better anyway.  Smarten up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill M</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3293#comment-52551</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3293#comment-52551</guid>
					<description>Good for Yahoo -- maybe someone is finally realizing that DRM does not work to stop piracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Yahoo &#8212; maybe someone is finally realizing that DRM does not work to stop piracy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.309 seconds -->
