<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conroe Unveiled</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51540</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51540</guid>
					<description>ValuedCustomer, I actually find that the price of processors from an online retailer is usually very, very close to the bulk price straight from AMD if not sometimes even lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ValuedCustomer, I actually find that the price of processors from an online retailer is usually very, very close to the bulk price straight from AMD if not sometimes even lower.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Another Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51532</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51532</guid>
					<description>Yep the AMD price dropping is a great thing. But we're getting to the state of the market we had quite a few years ago. If you wanted a great processor at a very good price get an AMD. If you want an even better processor at a slightly higher price then get a Core 2. 

I'm gonna guess that a lot of enthusiests in the need for a upgrade to what their using,(I am using an Athlon XP 2800+, and am looking to upgrade) will find very compelling choices from either side.

Oh and we really don't know where the pricing will land in the upcoming months for the Core 2. Sure there will be markup, but guessing how high isn't gonna get you anywhere. We'll just have to wait and see. But those that are buying computers from OEM (especially Tier 1) will be getting better performance per dollar since they do buy in bulk. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep the AMD price dropping is a great thing. But we&#8217;re getting to the state of the market we had quite a few years ago. If you wanted a great processor at a very good price get an AMD. If you want an even better processor at a slightly higher price then get a Core 2. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna guess that a lot of enthusiests in the need for a upgrade to what their using,(I am using an Athlon XP 2800+, and am looking to upgrade) will find very compelling choices from either side.</p>
<p>Oh and we really don&#8217;t know where the pricing will land in the upcoming months for the Core 2. Sure there will be markup, but guessing how high isn&#8217;t gonna get you anywhere. We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see. But those that are buying computers from OEM (especially Tier 1) will be getting better performance per dollar since they do buy in bulk.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ValuedCustomer</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51531</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51531</guid>
					<description>those quoted prices are bulk-rate (at least 1000) - tack on another 25% and then you'd be looking at retail. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those quoted prices are bulk-rate (at least 1000) - tack on another 25% and then you&#8217;d be looking at retail.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51530</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51530</guid>
					<description>This is why AMD is planning on dropping the prices of its chips by about 50% in some cases later this month.  Conroe being released at this pricing level is great news for consumers no matter which side of the AMD-Intel table you're on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why AMD is planning on dropping the prices of its chips by about 50% in some cases later this month.  Conroe being released at this pricing level is great news for consumers no matter which side of the AMD-Intel table you&#8217;re on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Another Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51524</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51524</guid>
					<description>ValuedCustomer - These prices are excellent for the performance you're getting out of them. Review... a $530 processor is routinely beating AMD’s $1000+ processor. Now the these are not the only 2 processors coming out of Intel. The Core 2 Duo E6400 will be $224 and the E6300 will be $183. 

With the benchmarks being where they are, I would suspect that at even at the 200 dollar level AMD is gonna have a tough time competing on the basis that their better than their goliath counterpart. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ValuedCustomer - These prices are excellent for the performance you&#8217;re getting out of them. Review&#8230; a $530 processor is routinely beating AMD’s $1000+ processor. Now the these are not the only 2 processors coming out of Intel. The Core 2 Duo E6400 will be $224 and the E6300 will be $183. </p>
<p>With the benchmarks being where they are, I would suspect that at even at the 200 dollar level AMD is gonna have a tough time competing on the basis that their better than their goliath counterpart.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ValuedCustomer</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51505</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51505</guid>
					<description>- "prices are excellent"?? as compared to what, platinum?? 

"the Core 2 Duo E6700, which runs at 2.66GHz and will cost approximately $530, and the Core 2 Extreme X6800, which clocks at 2.93GHz and is priced at $999. (These are prices for quantity 1,000.)"

- yea, I'm sure this is the beginning of the end for AMD.  

/yawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- &#8220;prices are excellent&#8221;?? as compared to what, platinum?? </p>
<p>&#8220;the Core 2 Duo E6700, which runs at 2.66GHz and will cost approximately $530, and the Core 2 Extreme X6800, which clocks at 2.93GHz and is priced at $999. (These are prices for quantity 1,000.)&#8221;</p>
<p>- yea, I&#8217;m sure this is the beginning of the end for AMD.  </p>
<p>/yawn
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51494</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51494</guid>
					<description>Intel definitely has a winner with the Core 2 and its prices are excellent as well.  Good job Intel :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel definitely has a winner with the Core 2 and its prices are excellent as well.  Good job Intel <img src='http://www.realtechnews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: 179326 Blog Verification</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51483</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3265#comment-51483</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;179326 Blog Verification&lt;/strong&gt;

179326</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>179326 Blog Verification</strong></p>
<p>179326
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.863 seconds -->
