May 27th, 2006

AT&T Improperly Redacts Document … Big Oops

By Michael Santo
Contributing Writer, RealTechNews

A redacted document is one that has been sanitized to remove sensitive material. In the “old days” you might photocopy a document, black out the info with ink, then re-photocopy the marked-up document (since it might be possible to read the original text via holding it up to the light … a decidely low-tech method). In this case AT&T released a PDF with text blacked out in the PDF … but unfortunately for AT&T, they forgot that all you have to do is select and copy the black-out sections, and paste it into, say Notepad … and there you go (and yes, I tried it, successfully).

The deleted portions of the legal brief seek to offer benign reasons why AT&T would allegedly have a secret room at its downtown San Francisco switching center that would be designed to monitor Internet and telephone traffic. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action lawsuit in January, alleges that the room is used by an unlawful National Security Agency surveillance program. Source: News.com

We Say: Before anyone gets up in arms about my posting this, it’s got nothing to do with politics (some were upset about my earlier story on Bush and his iPod, which was a jab at the RIAA if anyone). I find this certainly humorous, and definitely ironic, since in January the NSA released a document on how to do redactions securely. As technology advances, you have to be more careful, and this shows it.

Also, let’s not forget that the EFF blundered itself earlier in the case, when it accidentally placed sealed documents on the court’s public Web site. :-)

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. RSS 2.0

One comment to "AT&T Improperly Redacts Document … Big Oops"

  1. Ted Smith says:

    Wireless World: A marketing malfunction?
    The music industry’s latest lawsuit — this time against XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. over its new player — is generating a lot of poor publicity. Still, experts tell UPI’s Wireless World the recording business probably has a good argument in court because of an apparent marketing malfunction by the satellite-radio producers.
    Recent court decisions are giving the Washington-based Recording Industry Association of America a likely edge in this litigation. By Gene Koprowski hitech@upi.com

    May 29th, 2006 at 1:44 pm

Leave a comment