<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blue Security Inc. Gives In</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dougy</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-31592</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-31592</guid>
					<description>Currently e-mail is based on a "push" technology, whereby mail is sent to our local mail server and stored there till we download it.  What needs to happen is that mail servers must change to a "pull" technology, where only the header is sent to 'our' mail severs so that we can then pull it from 'their' server if so desired.  This will cut down a lot of the bandwidth abuse by the spammers and so freeing up the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently e-mail is based on a &#8220;push&#8221; technology, whereby mail is sent to our local mail server and stored there till we download it.  What needs to happen is that mail servers must change to a &#8220;pull&#8221; technology, where only the header is sent to &#8216;our&#8217; mail severs so that we can then pull it from &#8216;their&#8217; server if so desired.  This will cut down a lot of the bandwidth abuse by the spammers and so freeing up the internet.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-29395</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 16:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-29395</guid>
					<description>Well now that Blue Security completely WUSSED out, that spammer is now on the loose terrorising people like us and this money exchange site, by telling them to send him money or continue a massive Joe job to destroy thier domain. 
Shame on them for having so many people stick with them and believe in  what they are doing than pulling the plank from everybody. I am now getting hammered with these emails and there is not a damn thing I can do about it now. F*&#38;K you BLue Security!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now that Blue Security completely WUSSED out, that spammer is now on the loose terrorising people like us and this money exchange site, by telling them to send him money or continue a massive Joe job to destroy thier domain.<br />
Shame on them for having so many people stick with them and believe in  what they are doing than pulling the plank from everybody. I am now getting hammered with these emails and there is not a damn thing I can do about it now. F*&amp;K you BLue Security!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-27978</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-27978</guid>
					<description>Before anyone gets too self-righteous, it should be considered that Blue Security may know more about the situation at hand that what we do.

That said, which is more frustrating about SPAM? That it is sent to you, or that it actually works as a form of advertisement?

I mean, if SPAM didn't generate sales, it would cease to be, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before anyone gets too self-righteous, it should be considered that Blue Security may know more about the situation at hand that what we do.</p>
<p>That said, which is more frustrating about SPAM? That it is sent to you, or that it actually works as a form of advertisement?</p>
<p>I mean, if SPAM didn&#8217;t generate sales, it would cease to be, right?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-27719</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 16:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-27719</guid>
					<description>FYI: http://www.okopipi.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: <a href='http://www.okopipi.org/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.okopipi.org/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-27035</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 20:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-27035</guid>
					<description>This sucks. I finally found a site I was behind for fighting spam, and poof. it's gone. Personally I was all for sticking it to the spammers =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sucks. I finally found a site I was behind for fighting spam, and poof. it&#8217;s gone. Personally I was all for sticking it to the spammers =)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25196</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 23:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25196</guid>
					<description>I've yet to count this as a complete loss.  I'm betting there will be other companies or organizations that will take the Blue Security idea and start their own services.  Another idea I've heard floating around is making such a system P2P so it would be much harder to bring down.  We'll see.  I'm sure we've entered a quiet period now, but I don't expect the vacuum to stay for too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve yet to count this as a complete loss.  I&#8217;m betting there will be other companies or organizations that will take the Blue Security idea and start their own services.  Another idea I&#8217;ve heard floating around is making such a system P2P so it would be much harder to bring down.  We&#8217;ll see.  I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ve entered a quiet period now, but I don&#8217;t expect the vacuum to stay for too long.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hoozieg</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25184</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25184</guid>
					<description>This is "giving in to a TERRORIST'S demands" which this government will not allow to happen even if human lives are at stake.  Call in the troops, track this guy down and hang him from the nearest tree as a message to other spammers!  It makes me so mad that he's succeeded in bringing us down.  Someone needs to pull the plug on this guy and treat him like the terrorist he is.  Isn't it a crime to hold the entire internet hostage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is &#8220;giving in to a TERRORIST&#8217;S demands&#8221; which this government will not allow to happen even if human lives are at stake.  Call in the troops, track this guy down and hang him from the nearest tree as a message to other spammers!  It makes me so mad that he&#8217;s succeeded in bringing us down.  Someone needs to pull the plug on this guy and treat him like the terrorist he is.  Isn&#8217;t it a crime to hold the entire internet hostage?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PsychoHazard</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25180</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25180</guid>
					<description>Personally, I did sign up for this kind of thing. The spammers are nothing more than internet-savvy terrorists. I think it's perfectly justified to go to war with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I did sign up for this kind of thing. The spammers are nothing more than internet-savvy terrorists. I think it&#8217;s perfectly justified to go to war with them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25178</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 22:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25178</guid>
					<description>This Eran Reshef was like George Bush Sr. in the first gulf war.
Tell the Iraqis that if they fight Sadaam, then he will back them up, but bailed out and left them to be slaughtered. Checked my inboxes, I'm getting hammered again. 

he said “It’s clear to us that [quitting] would be the only thing to prevent a full-scale cyber-war that we just don’t have the authority to start,” Reshef said. “Our users never signed up for this kind of thing.” 

Um yes, we did. We agreed to that after the first attack. If I knew that Blue Security was going to bail out on us, I would have listened to the spammer and unsubscribed from their registry.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Eran Reshef was like George Bush Sr. in the first gulf war.<br />
Tell the Iraqis that if they fight Sadaam, then he will back them up, but bailed out and left them to be slaughtered. Checked my inboxes, I&#8217;m getting hammered again. </p>
<p>he said “It’s clear to us that [quitting] would be the only thing to prevent a full-scale cyber-war that we just don’t have the authority to start,” Reshef said. “Our users never signed up for this kind of thing.” </p>
<p>Um yes, we did. We agreed to that after the first attack. If I knew that Blue Security was going to bail out on us, I would have listened to the spammer and unsubscribed from their registry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ishtar</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25164</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 22:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3070#comment-25164</guid>
					<description>This is so sad. That spammers was so pissed off shows that it was working!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so sad. That spammers was so pissed off shows that it was working!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.409 seconds -->
