<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Law Gone Wild: String-Phone Granted a Patent</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ZS</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-447281</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-447281</guid>
					<description>I know this is way after the fact but Jack is holding the patent office to a standard that we are not legally bound to uphold.  "IT DOESN’T CONTRIBUTE ANYTHING TO SOCIETY." is not one of the statutes patent examiner's use to determine patentability.  Even if I think something is a stupid invention or completely obvious, I can't reject a patent because I think so.  I have to use the laws that are in place and find prior art which establishes at the time of invention that the application was something that was known.  So yes, stupid patents are out there, but the people are the ones abusing it.  Anytime we try to fix up loopholes that people exploit, they fight those changes in court because they enjoy being able to exploit them.  So stop blaming us, blame society. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is way after the fact but Jack is holding the patent office to a standard that we are not legally bound to uphold.  &#8220;IT DOESN’T CONTRIBUTE ANYTHING TO SOCIETY.&#8221; is not one of the statutes patent examiner&#8217;s use to determine patentability.  Even if I think something is a stupid invention or completely obvious, I can&#8217;t reject a patent because I think so.  I have to use the laws that are in place and find prior art which establishes at the time of invention that the application was something that was known.  So yes, stupid patents are out there, but the people are the ones abusing it.  Anytime we try to fix up loopholes that people exploit, they fight those changes in court because they enjoy being able to exploit them.  So stop blaming us, blame society. <img src='http://www.realtechnews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SillyMe</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-239286</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-239286</guid>
					<description>Would you believe I was contacted by someone trying to patent the idea of using a paper airplane as an ad and wants me to remove my website because I have my own paper airplane designs, do you think it's even possible to patent the idea of a paper airplane advertisement? Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you believe I was contacted by someone trying to patent the idea of using a paper airplane as an ad and wants me to remove my website because I have my own paper airplane designs, do you think it&#8217;s even possible to patent the idea of a paper airplane advertisement? Any thoughts?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mrgtmgdjen</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-224119</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-224119</guid>
					<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! uoskvoxaovj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! uoskvoxaovj
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: generic ambien</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-124259</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 04:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-124259</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;generic ambien...&lt;/strong&gt;

news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>generic ambien&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: !@#$%^&#38;*( =D =D =D</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-122400</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-122400</guid>
					<description>GayGayGayGayGay! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GayGayGayGayGay! =)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bianca</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-88242</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-88242</guid>
					<description>oiiiiii    tudo   bem ..............   como    vai    voce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oiiiiii    tudo   bem &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..   como    vai    voce
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lockergnome's Tech News Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-21036</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-21036</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Motorola Patents A New Therapeutic Vibrating Phone&lt;/strong&gt;

Alice Hill of RealTechNews writes: Ah patent law... who knew that writing about it would be so entertaining and infuriating at the same time? We have covered patents on the cup and string phone, the emoticon, and today, a new type of vibrating phone fr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motorola Patents A New Therapeutic Vibrating Phone</strong></p>
<p>Alice Hill of RealTechNews writes: Ah patent law&#8230; who knew that writing about it would be so entertaining and infuriating at the same time? We have covered patents on the cup and string phone, the emoticon, and today, a new type of vibrating phone fr&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-20979</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-20979</guid>
					<description>I gotta say that patent looks reasonable, in that if you look at the descriptive text, they acknowlege(sp?) that the can and string phone pre-exists and that this product os designed to be small, lightweight, foodsafe, and reliably assembled. The string/can phones of youth all fail at no lees than one of those, usuallt several.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say that patent looks reasonable, in that if you look at the descriptive text, they acknowlege(sp?) that the can and string phone pre-exists and that this product os designed to be small, lightweight, foodsafe, and reliably assembled. The string/can phones of youth all fail at no lees than one of those, usuallt several.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Motorola Patents a New Theraputic Vibrating Phone @ Alice Hill&#8217;s Real Tech News - Independent Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-20976</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-20976</guid>
					<description>[...] t it would be so entertaining and infuriating at the same time? We have covered patents on the cup and string phone, the emoticon, and today, a new type of vibrating phone from Motorola that would  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] t it would be so entertaining and infuriating at the same time? We have covered patents on the cup and string phone, the emoticon, and today, a new type of vibrating phone from Motorola that would  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Industrial Market Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-20248</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2877#comment-20248</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Light Friday: Of Donkeys, Wives &#38; Politicians, Jerry Garcia's Toilet, a Bob Ross Video Game...&lt;/strong&gt;

...Not-Yet-Built Navy Ship Survives 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, the eXtra-Super-Damn-Tiny microphone, some Drug PSAs, the 7 Most Endangered Wonders of the World...and, as usual, so much more!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Light Friday: Of Donkeys, Wives &#38; Politicians, Jerry Garcia&#8217;s Toilet, a Bob Ross Video Game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;Not-Yet-Built Navy Ship Survives 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, the eXtra-Super-Damn-Tiny microphone, some Drug PSAs, the 7 Most Endangered Wonders of the World&#8230;and, as usual, so much more!&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.855 seconds -->
