<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Localization Bug Causes Windows Defender Install Issue</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-1291509</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-1291509</guid>
					<description>This is very confusing.  "e. Click Add, type the object name of the non-English language local Users group, and then click OK two times."  What exactly do I type?  It doesn't take anything I put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very confusing.  &#8220;e. Click Add, type the object name of the non-English language local Users group, and then click OK two times.&#8221;  What exactly do I type?  It doesn&#8217;t take anything I put.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yoni5002</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13474</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13474</guid>
					<description>Hehehehe, it's stupid... guess what. I ran the Windows Defender installation and I knew I was going to have such a problem, OKIE DOKIE... Problem came up and I did half of the steps suggested to fix its issue, and I say half cos' I added a new local group named “Users” and without typing the object name of the non-English language local Users group the program finished the installation and ran!!!

I'm gonna keep running the Antispyware beta version, I think is secure... As I see it, Microsoft wants to prevent people from using the Antispyware beta due to the high demand for the little useful tool out there... they gift you a candy and then they try to take it away...

Microsoft You SUCK!!!

Yoni5002º
_________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehehe, it&#8217;s stupid&#8230; guess what. I ran the Windows Defender installation and I knew I was going to have such a problem, OKIE DOKIE&#8230; Problem came up and I did half of the steps suggested to fix its issue, and I say half cos&#8217; I added a new local group named “Users” and without typing the object name of the non-English language local Users group the program finished the installation and ran!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna keep running the Antispyware beta version, I think is secure&#8230; As I see it, Microsoft wants to prevent people from using the Antispyware beta due to the high demand for the little useful tool out there&#8230; they gift you a candy and then they try to take it away&#8230;</p>
<p>Microsoft You SUCK!!!</p>
<p>Yoni5002º<br />
_________
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13414</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13414</guid>
					<description>The fix for the "user" issue has been posted, so download the new installer and you shouldn't run into that.

The KB Article to get GDI+ on Win2k before Windows Defender installation is at http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=915052

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fix for the &#8220;user&#8221; issue has been posted, so download the new installer and you shouldn&#8217;t run into that.</p>
<p>The KB Article to get GDI+ on Win2k before Windows Defender installation is at <a href='http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=915052' rel='nofollow'>http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=915052</a></p>
<p>Mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13318</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13318</guid>
					<description>Michael banging on a beta microsoft product.

What's new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael banging on a beta microsoft product.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s new?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill King</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13174</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2716#comment-13174</guid>
					<description>*smirks*. Not the only bug. I get a gdi+ complaint, asking for the "security pack pre-installation kit" or somesuch, mostly complaining of missing gdi+ on win2k. Both can't find the so called pack on the microsoft site (even via their own internal search), nor does installing gdi+ from the platform development end-user runtimes fix the problem. Well tested microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*smirks*. Not the only bug. I get a gdi+ complaint, asking for the &#8220;security pack pre-installation kit&#8221; or somesuch, mostly complaining of missing gdi+ on win2k. Both can&#8217;t find the so called pack on the microsoft site (even via their own internal search), nor does installing gdi+ from the platform development end-user runtimes fix the problem. Well tested microsoft.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.206 seconds -->
