<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Cell Reception? Get Your Own Tower</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13287</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13287</guid>
					<description>Or you could just order a da4000sbr for $395 that doesn't have any user # limitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could just order a da4000sbr for $395 that doesn&#8217;t have any user # limitations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13266</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13266</guid>
					<description>Eh, the 5-user version only needs 12-volt supply, finding an wall wart AC adaptor for that would not be difficult, and you get a decent dB boost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, the 5-user version only needs 12-volt supply, finding an wall wart AC adaptor for that would not be difficult, and you get a decent dB boost.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13065</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13065</guid>
					<description>At that price it's a heck of a lot less interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At that price it&#8217;s a heck of a lot less interesting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13064</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2714#comment-13064</guid>
					<description>Neat idea, but according to http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/02/17/signalwide_cellphone_tower/:

"$229 for the one-user version to $999 for the 68 user mode"
"In the one-user version called the ClickitBase, the phone must be physically connected to the unit with a small cable that hooks into the external antenna port of your phone."

The one-user version is priced right, but the need to physically connect to the unit is seriously uncool.  Maybe this is the company's way of strongly encouraging a more expensive unit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat idea, but according to <a href='http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/02/17/signalwide_cellphone_tower/:' rel='nofollow'>http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/02/17/signalwide_cellphone_tower/:</a></p>
<p>&#8220;$229 for the one-user version to $999 for the 68 user mode&#8221;<br />
&#8220;In the one-user version called the ClickitBase, the phone must be physically connected to the unit with a small cable that hooks into the external antenna port of your phone.&#8221;</p>
<p>The one-user version is priced right, but the need to physically connect to the unit is seriously uncool.  Maybe this is the company&#8217;s way of strongly encouraging a more expensive unit?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.410 seconds -->
