<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.K. Wants Backdoor Into Vista PCs</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: clifford</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-53186</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-53186</guid>
					<description>This is the coolest La Cocina.  &lt;a href="http://www.webfreefind.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;nokia6630&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the coolest La Cocina.  <a href="http://www.webfreefind.com" rel="nofollow">nokia6630</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cherly</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-52994</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-52994</guid>
					<description>Holla and Happy Thanksgiving.  &lt;a href="http://www.webfreefind.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;nokia6630&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holla and Happy Thanksgiving.  <a href="http://www.webfreefind.com" rel="nofollow">nokia6630</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-13063</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-13063</guid>
					<description>Drive all the peeping toms nuts. Take some random numbers, encrypt them, send messages all over, hoping for interception by the decrypting organizations.  Wonder what the cost is to try to decypher the undecypherable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drive all the peeping toms nuts. Take some random numbers, encrypt them, send messages all over, hoping for interception by the decrypting organizations.  Wonder what the cost is to try to decypher the undecypherable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: veridicus</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12890</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12890</guid>
					<description>Most people don't know the NSA has had a back door into Windows for many years: http://www.msversus.org/node/65</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people don&#8217;t know the NSA has had a back door into Windows for many years: <a href='http://www.msversus.org/node/65' rel='nofollow'>http://www.msversus.org/node/65</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12886</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12886</guid>
					<description>Sergio:  No.  TrueCrypt is an excellent choice for encryption, as it employs well known algorithms that are trusted.  The software is open source, so they could not get away with putting a backdoor in because there is no way to hide it.  Refer to &lt;a href="http://www.truecrypt.org/faq.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;the TrueCrypt FAQ&lt;/a&gt; for more information...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sergio:  No.  TrueCrypt is an excellent choice for encryption, as it employs well known algorithms that are trusted.  The software is open source, so they could not get away with putting a backdoor in because there is no way to hide it.  Refer to <a href="http://www.truecrypt.org/faq.php" rel="nofollow">the TrueCrypt FAQ</a> for more information&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Computerworld Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12878</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12878</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Office Live is not MS Office (and a lacy keyboard)&lt;/strong&gt;

In today's IT Blogwatch, we look at Office Live -- is it alive or dead? Not to mention eat and type off the same tablecloth ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Office Live is not MS Office (and a lacy keyboard)</strong></p>
<p>In today&#8217;s IT Blogwatch, we look at Office Live &#8212; is it alive or dead? Not to mention eat and type off the same tablecloth &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sergio Pereira</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12863</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12863</guid>
					<description>Now I'm concerned. I'm starting to use TrueCrypt (truecrypt.org) extensively for protecting sensitive information. Does anyone know if TrueCrypt or any of the algorithms used there have backdoors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m concerned. I&#8217;m starting to use TrueCrypt (truecrypt.org) extensively for protecting sensitive information. Does anyone know if TrueCrypt or any of the algorithms used there have backdoors?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Perros</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12843</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12843</guid>
					<description>Meh, the CCTV cameras are mostly privately run. 

As for a backdoor. This is definitely a bad idea. I can't see Microsoft giving in to it either, because other government legislation (for the US and UK governments) states that ALL features have to be fully documented and public (which is why they stopped putting in easter eggs). So any backdoor would have to be public, which ruins the point!

-Perros-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, the CCTV cameras are mostly privately run. </p>
<p>As for a backdoor. This is definitely a bad idea. I can&#8217;t see Microsoft giving in to it either, because other government legislation (for the US and UK governments) states that ALL features have to be fully documented and public (which is why they stopped putting in easter eggs). So any backdoor would have to be public, which ruins the point!</p>
<p>-Perros-
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ValuedCustomer</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12809</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12809</guid>
					<description>"I’m surprised … surprised the U.S. didn’t say anything about this first, knowing our government."

riiight, cuz everyone knows how invasive the US govt is compared to other 1st-world goverments. puhlease. - ever even been to the UK? notice all those cute little CCTV cameras EVERYWHERE? maybe you didn't (they're hidden many times) FYI, those cameras aren't there to protect you, they're there to keep an eye on you. and let's not even start on the national id cards that are just around the bend for the UK. - Don't get me wrong, the UK is a great country and I really like this site but let's try and keep political-fallacies/partisan-despotic-fantasies apart from our techy news, k?

on this site, today, we're all techy-dorks!  \;^)-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m surprised … surprised the U.S. didn’t say anything about this first, knowing our government.&#8221;</p>
<p>riiight, cuz everyone knows how invasive the US govt is compared to other 1st-world goverments. puhlease. - ever even been to the UK? notice all those cute little CCTV cameras EVERYWHERE? maybe you didn&#8217;t (they&#8217;re hidden many times) FYI, those cameras aren&#8217;t there to protect you, they&#8217;re there to keep an eye on you. and let&#8217;s not even start on the national id cards that are just around the bend for the UK. - Don&#8217;t get me wrong, the UK is a great country and I really like this site but let&#8217;s try and keep political-fallacies/partisan-despotic-fantasies apart from our techy news, k?</p>
<p>on this site, today, we&#8217;re all techy-dorks!  \;^)-
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lockergnome's Tech News Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12806</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2689#comment-12806</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;U.K. Wants Back Door Into Vista PCs&lt;/strong&gt;

Michael Santo of RealTechNews writes: I'm surprised... surprised the U.S. didn't say anything about this first, knowing our government. :-) At any rate, because of the new built-in drive encryption features in Windows Vista, law enforcement officials...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>U.K. Wants Back Door Into Vista PCs</strong></p>
<p>Michael Santo of RealTechNews writes: I&#8217;m surprised&#8230; surprised the U.S. didn&#8217;t say anything about this first, knowing our government. <img src='http://www.realtechnews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  At any rate, because of the new built-in drive encryption features in Windows Vista, law enforcement officials&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.771 seconds -->
