<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive Preview: Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 Beta 2</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jarretthousenorth.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Just when you thought the browser wars were over&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-731546</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-731546</guid>
					<description>[...] The public beta of Internet Explorer 7 hit today. Reaction: Dave Winer, CNET, PC Magazine/ABC News/Go, PC World, RealTechNews, Ars Technica. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The public beta of Internet Explorer 7 hit today. Reaction: Dave Winer, CNET, PC Magazine/ABC News/Go, PC World, RealTechNews, Ars Technica. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jarrett House North &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Just when you thought the browser wars were over&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-711452</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-711452</guid>
					<description>[...] The public beta of Internet Explorer 7 hit today. Reaction: Dave Winer, CNET, PC Magazine/ABC News/Go, PC World, RealTechNews, Ars Technica. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The public beta of Internet Explorer 7 hit today. Reaction: Dave Winer, CNET, PC Magazine/ABC News/Go, PC World, RealTechNews, Ars Technica. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: web hosting domain name registration window linux asp php sql mysql cheap small busniss web hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-80402</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-80402</guid>
					<description>&lt;a href="http://www.medimenia.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;web hosting domain name registration window linux asp php sql mysql cheap small busniss web hosting&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.medimenia.com" rel="nofollow"><b>web hosting domain name registration window linux asp php sql mysql cheap small busniss web hosting</b></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sameer chavan</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-15064</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-15064</guid>
					<description>IE7 has lot of bugs and slow performance. May Java scripts do not work in IE7. The UI is very confusing and non scalable. The bookmarks have no improvements and adds to choas. Can anyone tell me how to swithch back to IE6. I am in a trap and many applications dont work with IE7. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 has lot of bugs and slow performance. May Java scripts do not work in IE7. The UI is very confusing and non scalable. The bookmarks have no improvements and adds to choas. Can anyone tell me how to swithch back to IE6. I am in a trap and many applications dont work with IE7.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PaulT</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-11071</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-11071</guid>
					<description>Also installed IE7 Beta 2 - quite impressed with look and feel. Finally getting close to Opera which I use at home.

But I had porblems with seeing Intranet pages. Could easily go to Internet sites through the firewall.

Tried as many variations in Tools-Internet Options-Connections-LAN Settings with no luck.

Backed out to IE6 as I needed to continue working. Colleague had similar experience and also backed out.

And whilst I'm not a Windows fanatic (OS/2 was the system pity IBM couldn't market correctly) looks as if MS is finally getting closer to what the users want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also installed IE7 Beta 2 - quite impressed with look and feel. Finally getting close to Opera which I use at home.</p>
<p>But I had porblems with seeing Intranet pages. Could easily go to Internet sites through the firewall.</p>
<p>Tried as many variations in Tools-Internet Options-Connections-LAN Settings with no luck.</p>
<p>Backed out to IE6 as I needed to continue working. Colleague had similar experience and also backed out.</p>
<p>And whilst I&#8217;m not a Windows fanatic (OS/2 was the system pity IBM couldn&#8217;t market correctly) looks as if MS is finally getting closer to what the users want.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Parag</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10894</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10894</guid>
					<description>MS is late to introduce this kind of functionality, also i cant see any valid reason to switch back from Firefox..... 
Still MS products cant be relied upon :)

There is always SWAG in MS things left for the hackers to point out and take advantage ! 


~PB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS is late to introduce this kind of functionality, also i cant see any valid reason to switch back from Firefox&#8230;..<br />
Still MS products cant be relied upon <img src='http://www.realtechnews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There is always SWAG in MS things left for the hackers to point out and take advantage ! </p>
<p>~PB
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10806</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10806</guid>
					<description>Anonymous Coward, the 3 groups of people were per Microsoft.  I may have my own list of groups myself :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous Coward, the 3 groups of people were per Microsoft.  I may have my own list of groups myself <img src='http://www.realtechnews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10805</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10805</guid>
					<description>Chubby, under Platform Changes, I put the very general statement: "Besides increasing standards compliance".  They are attempting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chubby, under Platform Changes, I put the very general statement: &#8220;Besides increasing standards compliance&#8221;.  They are attempting this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chubby</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10790</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10790</guid>
					<description>You didn't mention web design standards in your article. Is MS making any progress in adhering to them yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t mention web design standards in your article. Is MS making any progress in adhering to them yet?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FireyFox</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10779</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2605#comment-10779</guid>
					<description>Sorry but from what I read its no reason to give up Firefox yet.   I only "switch back and forth" when I run into some poorly designed website whose programmer didn't provide Forefox support, and so far those have been very rare.
Sounds like Microsoft (as usual) still has a long way to go.
Their refusal to port any of this over to the Mac world won't win them any more friends either.  With the new Intel Macs coming out there stands to be a good market there, which they're leaving open for the Mozilla folks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but from what I read its no reason to give up Firefox yet.   I only &#8220;switch back and forth&#8221; when I run into some poorly designed website whose programmer didn&#8217;t provide Forefox support, and so far those have been very rare.<br />
Sounds like Microsoft (as usual) still has a long way to go.<br />
Their refusal to port any of this over to the Mac world won&#8217;t win them any more friends either.  With the new Intel Macs coming out there stands to be a good market there, which they&#8217;re leaving open for the Mozilla folks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.515 seconds -->
