<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navy Tests &#8220;Look to Talk&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: J3</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-10224</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 06:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-10224</guid>
					<description>I'd be willing to bet that that's  the marketing message .... "just a dumb remote control LED"... from what I've seen, the military doesn't want the world to know full capabilities of new technologies.... just enough information to let the taxpayers know that their money is being spent wisely...  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be willing to bet that that&#8217;s  the marketing message &#8230;. &#8220;just a dumb remote control LED&#8221;&#8230; from what I&#8217;ve seen, the military doesn&#8217;t want the world to know full capabilities of new technologies&#8230;. just enough information to let the taxpayers know that their money is being spent wisely&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ed3</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9548</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9548</guid>
					<description>Anyone with a CCD-based camera would be able to see the IR light. Point a TV remote at a video/web/digital still camera and start pushing buttons to see what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone with a CCD-based camera would be able to see the IR light. Point a TV remote at a video/web/digital still camera and start pushing buttons to see what I mean.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9507</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9507</guid>
					<description>Well..the beam would fan out so not that steady.  It's probably just looking for the wavelength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well..the beam would fan out so not that steady.  It&#8217;s probably just looking for the wavelength.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9492</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9492</guid>
					<description>Good question.  It's not like a ship is the most stable platform (cue Dramamine here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question.  It&#8217;s not like a ship is the most stable platform (cue Dramamine here).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9491</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2480#comment-9491</guid>
					<description>That's actually pretty cool but I wonder how steady you have to be able to get those binoculars in order to get unbroken communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually pretty cool but I wonder how steady you have to be able to get those binoculars in order to get unbroken communication.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.402 seconds -->
