<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackberry Back in Action? NTP&#8217;s Patents Expected to be Rejected</title>
	<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349</link>
	<description>Independent Tech News and Product Reviews from former VP and head of CNET.com and Longtime Computer Shopper Columnist, Alice Hill author of the popular "Hard Edge" column. Originally named AliceandBill.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8060</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8060</guid>
					<description>Whether the patents for NTP are justified or not are up to the courts to decide. However, let's not forget that Xerox thought it could take on Palm and lost.  It is not over until the lady sings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether the patents for NTP are justified or not are up to the courts to decide. However, let&#8217;s not forget that Xerox thought it could take on Palm and lost.  It is not over until the lady sings.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8013</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8013</guid>
					<description>Corrected it - thanks for pointing it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected it - thanks for pointing it out!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8004</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8004</guid>
					<description>Our spell check plug-in broke. I have asked contributors to check everything but sometimes we miss something. But that's the beauty of the web - we can correct a mistake. And I will remind contributors again to double-check spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our spell check plug-in broke. I have asked contributors to check everything but sometimes we miss something. But that&#8217;s the beauty of the web - we can correct a mistake. And I will remind contributors again to double-check spelling.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8003</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-8003</guid>
					<description>What's wrong with using spellcheck?  Wrong word in context is bad enough, but misspellings are unforgivable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with using spellcheck?  Wrong word in context is bad enough, but misspellings are unforgivable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-7986</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 06:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2349#comment-7986</guid>
					<description>"almost definetly"

Yeah, that IS almost "definitely"!

Alice, misspellings hurt credibility. Cute and not credible is no way to make it on the 'net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;almost definetly&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that IS almost &#8220;definitely&#8221;!</p>
<p>Alice, misspellings hurt credibility. Cute and not credible is no way to make it on the &#8216;net.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.445 seconds -->
