Comments on: Windows Vista to Boot in Under 4 Seconds

by: D

Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:57:29 +0000

mate, if your machine boots with xp in 20 mins then with vista it will take it half an hour….

by: Macintosh Vista OS X Infinite Edition

Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:07:28 +0000

i thing the problem is on that files in the prefetch delete all them and then apply what others say to you

by: A H

Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:44:16 +0000

I have a 40 second power-button press to desktop boot speed with 6 seconds just devoted to the BIOS showing up. The problem is that I don’t want to “Work Immediately”…I want my startup programs to run immediately…not wait for 30 seconds then load.

by: mixed up

Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:56:45 +0000

I have both PC’s and apple,
My two favorites, My G4 and my Dell 745 cost me about the same, my 745 is faster.
Its amazing that apple only people read posts about Vista and call it down feverishly.
I thonk they are still trying to convince themselves that thier Apple was the right choice.
I have both, some are great for some stuff and others for other stuff, And I like it….

by: 147eb9e00ca85b089645de4599630639

Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:31:45 +0000

147eb9e00ca85b089645de4599630639…

147eb9e00ca85b089645de4599630639…

by: Pilotgeek

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:55:29 +0000

I had to do a double take on that, i thought it said 20 seconds! I used to have a computer that slow, but it was a 200mhz laptop running xp. My 2003 1.8ghz computer boots up in about 50 seconds from the power button to the point that I have Firefox, aim, and msn all running. I know a friend who has a computer that should run circles around mine but it doesn’t because of unnecessary stuff he has. I’m not criticizing, im just saying that if you take the time you may realize that some system tray icons or updates might not be necessary.

by: 88 is retarded

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:49:07 +0000

why do ppl come on here and spat shit when they dont know what theyre saying. im running 1.5gb of ram and am on vista right now. i currently am using 615mb of that ram with firefox, outlook, and mcafee suite running. im am on vista ultimate edition with aero visual so that itself takes up quite a bit. however when i get into C:SS HL2 or BF2 my ram gets up to about 70 percent usage at most. this number is barely any higher than what i was running at on xp pro. the average user wont need a 500 cpu, a 400 dollar ram, and 500 for a video card. i get almost the same frame rates outta all three of the games listed above as i did with xp. so your theory that everyone will need to completely rehaul their pcs to play 3d games is a load of shit. if you couldnt play it on xp then duh it wont work on vista… but if it works on xp and u get good frame rates theres no question that vista will match them.

by: 88

Tue, 05 Sep 2006 05:27:07 +0000

i hope the pc indusrty goes bankrupt
vista is piece of crap! it recommends 1 gig of ram to run good
1 gig of ram happens to be 200$ or more ! gamers say youll need 2 gigs to play games THATS $430 DOLLARS just for fast ram and thats insane! no one can afford 430$ for ram chips and 500 dollars for a fast game card! or500$ for a cpu chip, pc hardware and software prices are unnaceptable ! A good gamer pc should not be more than 1000$ but theyre 4000$ just unnacceptable! you have to buy
a slow crappy pc if youre out to buy one. thanks to these
corporations, buying a pc is never a good purchase.

by: sexpokie

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:06:42 +0000

you guys are fags! chivalry is dead ! im having sex with alice right now! shes pretty hot! but hey so am i..

by: Lockergnome's Tech News Watch

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:58:23 +0000

Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Microsoft Windows Vista

I have to admit, Vista was low on my list until I saw the demo of the new 3D windows and other enhancements recently added into the mix. To get up to speed, I found a great site called Aviran’s Place that gathered up a lot of questions (and thankfully…