June 29th, 2005

CPU Decoder Ring Helps Decipher the Latest CPUs

By David Johnston
Contributing Writer, RealTechNews

CPU speeds have gotten a lot more complicated than they used to be. In addition to just clock speed, there’s also cache size, and the speed of the FSB that are frequently varied–even within the same brand name of CPU. To help consumers (or so they say) with their confusion over these additional variables, both Intel and AMD have started to use model numbers on their processor instead of just the clock speed.

For example, there are two different kinds of Athlon XP 3000+. What’s the difference? Clock speed and FSB. That’s not nearly the worst example, however. Take the Athlon 64 3200+. There are not one, not two, not three, but *four* different variations of the same processor, not even counting the mobile variant. These differences include clock speed, cache, process (the size of the transistors), and even the socket that they fit into.

Intel meanwhile, has gone with a naming system that is even more obtuse than AMD’s (in my opinion) by using a BMW-like three number scheme to rate its CPU’s speed. So how fast is that Pentium 4 515 and how does it stack up against the 520…or the 520J? Well, the Tech Report has answered all of your questions with a spy-like “CPU Decoder Ring”. This little table which can be sorted on any of the criteria it covers will tell you all of the information you wish you knew about your processor’s clock speed, FSB, cache, socket, voltage, and more. Take a look here.

UPDATE: for AMD processors specifically, AMD has set up its own information page which you can find here.

Intel has added similar functionality to its own site both here and here.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. RSS 2.0

6 comments to "CPU Decoder Ring Helps Decipher the Latest CPUs"

  1. Phoole says:

    Very old, not updated since March 4th, so no new stuff.

    June 29th, 2005 at 8:02 am

  2. David Johnston says:

    This was originally posted in March when it was new, but I’ve updated the article to include AMD and Intel’s sites with this information.

    June 29th, 2005 at 8:53 am

  3. Cyrus says:

    Still, all the repeated content isn’t interesting.

    June 29th, 2005 at 10:03 pm

  4. David says:

    It’s not my post. This was set to auto-repeat by Alice.

    June 30th, 2005 at 8:07 am

  5. David says:

    Oh, and btw, the decoder ring *has* been updated. It includes all of the latest processors including the dual-core ones. It is missing the FX-57…but that just came out a few days ago.

    June 30th, 2005 at 8:08 am

  6. Cyrus says:

    Well, thats great if its been updated, but I would suggest that next time something is reposted AND updated, that a line is added at the top of the entry to inform someone that something changed.

    June 30th, 2005 at 11:13 am

Leave a comment