By David Johnston
Contributing Writer, RealTechNews
Tor, sponsored by the EFF, and Google’s new beta VPN are both aimed at those of us who want to protect our privacy and rights online. While Google claims that its VPN program is to boost security on wireless networks, it can also be used with wired internet connections to add some more security for the rest of us. Tor, on the other hand, does not use a VPN but instead its own program which acts essentially like a VPN with a few exceptions. One of the nice features of the Tor network is that instead of connecting two only one server it connects to one server which then connects to another server (and so on) and forms a chain of encrypted traffic. Each hop also has a unique key, so that makes it incredibly difficult to track where information is going. That’s not to say that Google’s VPN isn’t secure. It’s more like saying that the people who made Tor are insanely paranoid.
Other key differences are the nature of the forces behind each program. The EFF does not in any way have access to your surfing data while Google specifically says that it will store (and possibly sell) information about your surfing behavior though they also say that they strip this data of anything personally identifiable. Something that is interesting to note here is that the Google VPN is centralized while Tor is not. That means that it would be easier to find information out from Google than it would from the Tor network (by many degrees of magnitude). Also, since Google is a commercial company it will most likely comply with requests made by the government or organization like the RIAA or MPAA to track the identity (or at least the IP and/or MAC address) of certain users. For these reasons, the Tor network is inherently more secure and anonymous than Google’s VPN. Google’s VPN is, however, anonymous for the most part unless you start doing things online which will get you noticed by said organizations.
Read more below to find out what kind of effect these applications have on the speed of your browsing and downloading and some final thoughts.
I was a great guinea pig for testing the speed of these different applications because the internet connection at my college is incredibly fast and will generally max out any server I connect to. These are the results I found using the speed test from . I made sure to disable or turn off any programs that might be trying to access the internet other than my web browser for these tests:
First off are my default settings using no proxy or VPN. As you can see, it’s very fast:
Next are my results using the Google VPN. While the speed is significantly decreased, there is no discernible difference in moderate to heavy web browsing:
Finally, my results using Tor. I’ll tell you right now, though, they are very disappointing. More on that after:
It is also important to note that Tor servers are not necessarily in the United States, so websites that automatically detect which country you are in (like the Google search engine) may not function as you’d like. It’s an annoyance, but generally not the end of the world:
In my view, the Google VPN clearly wins hands-down between the two for ease of use and speed, though it can’t touch Tor’s anonymity. I would probably forgo both of them, however, in place of good firewall protection and well-configured browsers. The added anonymity of the Google VPN is not worth it in my opinion and Tor is just too slow. Tor’s effect on web browsing is very noticeable. At some points it’s like using AOL dialup (yes, it can be that bad). If you are as paranoid as the people at the EFF are, however, Tor is awesome. Just make you configure all your applications to use it as they must each be manually added and configured (which is time consuming and often difficult). That said, if you’re using wireless networks frequently and just want a quick and easy way to improve your anonymity while browsing the web using WiFi, then the Google VPN might be right up your alley.
Check out Tor and the Google VPN though be sure to read Google’s privacy policy first to make sure you agree to it.
Google’s VPN would naturally be much faster, since there’s a central server you’re communicating with. Tor routes your traffic through a number of servers, and encrypts/decrypts at each node, so your traffic will be limited by the node with the least bandwidth.
Not sure if this is a valid comparison, since Google VPN seems to be more for securing wireless traffic, which is easily snoopable. It doesn’t seem to be meant for anonamizing your web surfing traffic, which is what Tor is made for. Apples and Oranges.
I wouldn’t call it apples to oranges. People still compare Macs to PC’s even though they’re different in so many ways. It’s just two different approaches to doing similar things. They both overlap enough to make them compete with each other and it’s useful for people to have a comparison between them so they can see for themselves which would better suit their uses.
I wouldn’t expect that Tor would be the transport one would use for everyday surfing, just to keep the boss at bay. The Google VPN would be for that sort of purpose. Tor is suited for leaking those photos of US army coffins or China’s plans to nuke Taiwan. You’d have to be pretty paranoid to use Tor on a regular basis, but you’d be crazy not to use it when you are going to antagonize somebody big.
Shoot-out: Google’s new VPN beta kicks the living Hell out of the EFF’s Tor
Speed test: Tor, sponsored by the EFF, and Googleâ??s new beta VPN are both aimed at those of us who …
Hi David,
Tor can never be compared to any other anonymous system on the internet . Its one of the best and the most paranoid.
I would give it a full thumbsup, but if you want absolute anonymity u need tor, remember link is only as secure as the weakest link!!!
Tor is an anonymous wrapper for all specified network traffic and Google’s VPN service is just an encrypted tunnel between a Wi-Fi hotspot and your destination protecting your traffic from potentially being captured / sniffed.
THERE IS NO COMPARISON!
If you feel that there is any comparison what so ever you really need to sit down and do your homework on each of these services before stating ridiculous comparisons.
Tor would have the same effect as the Google VPN with regard to having your internet traffic being sniffed over WiFi…it just does more. That’s like saying you shouldn’t compare Firefox and Lynx because Lynx doesn’t display images.
By the way, did you *read* the comparison? If you did, you’d notice that I pointed out that they are tremendously different. I don’t know how you think I didn’t “do my homework” for this even though I explained roughly how they work, covering the major differences and also used them myself.
Lynx vs. Firefox, Tor vs. Google VPN: sure, you can compare these things, but any similarities gleaned are tenuous. I could write a comparison that features a horse-drawn carriage, the shoes on my feet, and a Honda Civic because they’re all modes of transportation that achieve the same effect. But the people using each item are doing so for different reasons.
Simply: a Tor user wants anonymity, and a [Google] VPN user wants privacy. These disparate goals inform the services’ immensely different usage in the real world. So why compare them? Your exposition is good and well-researched, but framing it as a direct comparison belies a fundamental misunderstanding of the purposes of these services.
I *did* read the “comparison”; in fact, I read it quite a few times. I found that this article would be fine if only you were not comparing these services but just evaluating them as two completely different services.
Why should these services not be compared for those who don’t know. I think the article makes it very clear what each one is good for and why you should use one over the other in a given situation.
free online poker room …
In this case rank edge free online poker room em? …
I think you’re right. If you want to surf with some security, Google VPN is pretty good. If you absolutely want to be anonymous, use Tor.
I have to say though, Tor is more remarkable.
The biggest difference imo is that when you use Tor your identity is completely hidden. When you use google VPN you just hand over all you private date to one website instead of many.
I would go for a different VPN or whatnot altogether for wifi, Google being google….
It is rediculous to compare the speed of Tor and Google’s VPN like this. They are for completely different purposes and work completely differently.
Google’s VPN protects you against basic attempts to invade your privacy in a completely insecure enviroment (eg. on an unsecured wifi network). It does this by routing your net connection via a single (fast) google server.
Tor protects against relatively sophisticated atempts to invade your privacy by someopne with extensive resources (eg. a government of a totalitarian state). This can’t be done by trusting a single server (eg. google) because this could be comprimised. Therefore it routes your connection through multiple other uses PCs.
Saying Tor performs badly compared to Google VPN is like saying an olympic cyclist is bad at cycling because your car can go faster.